ACSH relies on donors like you. If you enjoy our work, please contribute.

And low is 5% and below. Agency officials have used these benchmarks for "high" and "low" for decades, dating back to the formulation of the nutrition facts label back in the 1990s. At the time ...

Nutrition Facts label vs FOP Nutrition Info box The design of the FOP Nutrition Info box has ... proliferation of artificial sweeteners that hide behind chemical names Americans do not recognize - ...

“For decades, the Nutrition Facts label has been an essential tool to educate people across the country about the nutritional content of their food and drinks, but high rates of diet-related ...

According to the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF), both overweight and obesity levels in the country are already considered “high” by global standards. One way to ...

The proposed new label wouldn't replace the nutrition facts label found on the back of packaged foods, but is instead designed to complement it. The FDA says consumers could use the new ...

It could soon be harder to ignore the nutritional red flags on your favorite junk food. This week, the Food and Drug Administration unveiled a long-awaited proposal that would require food and ...

The FOP label would not replace the standard Nutrition Facts label, which would still ... other countries ban these poisons that make our kids sick” and pledged to “stop the mass poisoning ...

The label, which the FDA is calling a "Nutrition Info Box," is essentially a downsized version of the nutrition information found at the back of packaging, known as the "Nutrition Facts label." ...

And low is 5% and below. Agency officials have used these benchmarks for "high" and "low" for decades, dating back to the formulation of the nutrition facts label back in the 1990s. At the time ...

The Nutrition Info box would be separate from the Nutrition Facts label, which is the larger, more detailed label often found on the back or the side of a package. Rather, the FDA says it is ...