All five answers to the questions below have something in common. Can you figure it out?

Judge David Schenck calls out lax Texas laws that undermine public confidence in the courts, despite winning with support from deep-pocketed special interests.

1/9/1919: Schenck v. United States argued.

Facebook is changing as the move to replace third-party fact-checking with user-written “community notes” seemingly may ...

Facebook is changing as the move to replace third-party fact-checking with user-written “community notes” seemingly may ...

Could it be stopped? This question brings to mind Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ famous analogy from the 1919 Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States concerning falsely shouting “fire ...

The fate of the Chinese-owned app is uncertain, but the effects of banning it would ripple through campus communities.

May 20 2024 Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 10, 2024. Jul 10 2024 Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.

Apr 24 2024 Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 29, 2024. May 29 2024 Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. VIDED.

The common misconception that it's illegal to shout "fire" in a crowded theater originates with a hypothetical used by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in the 1919 Supreme Court case Schenck v.