A new study published in Law and Human Behavior shows that people tend to perceive criminal suspects who exercise their right ...

In 1966, the Supreme Court ruled that police must inform suspects of their Miranda Rights before speaking about the incident, ...

The Supreme Court upheld a law requiring a sale or ban of TikTok, but Justice Sonia Sotomayor disagreed with part of the decision.

An overwhelming majority of people from Idaho testified against resolution, but legislators listened to out-of-state special ...

the requirement to give Miranda rights came from the Supreme Court case Miranda V. Arizona in 1966. On March 3, 1963, Phoenix Police arrested Ernesto Miranda on the charges of rape, kidnapping ...

Each era brings new challenges and interpretations that shape the foundation of law and justice in the United States.

The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. A short explanation of relists is available here. The Supreme Court’s upcoming confer ...

The fate of TikTok’s U.S. operations might be decided Friday after the Supreme Court said it may announce opinions in the morning, potentially delivering a ruling on TikTok days before the ban ...

DORAL, Fla. — President Trump floated running for a third term, commented on a new Chinese artificial intelligence, and urged House Republicans to unify and quickly advance his legislative priorities ...

The Supreme Court has signaled it will release at least one opinion Friday, a hastily scheduled announcement that comes as TikTok’s divest-or-ban deadline approaches Sunday. The justices ...

The U.S. Supreme Court decided Monday, Dec. 6, to re-evaluate one of the foundations of the contemporary American legal system. Miranda v. Arizona, the 1966 case that resulted in the requirement of ...